- Give a brief summary of your final device/design and explain what features you’ve designed to address the needs of your problem
- The final design for the team’s bait launcher is in a “U” shape with a detachable barrel where the compressed air tank is in order to save space and create for easier portability and storage. It’s also designed around schedule 80 PVC in order to create cost saving, while still being able to handle high pressures.
- Provide 2-3 key Validation results that indicate how close you have come to meeting your project goals. Are these results acceptable to you? How do you think you could do better?
- The team’s distance validation has been met as it was able to reach the desired 250 yards within the working pressure of 100 psi. Another validation test that the team had done was the ruggedness test where the team tested to see if the tank will fail through cycling of being dropped. The tank passed both test. The tank was able to sustain from 50 cycles at 125 psi without any failures. A drop test was also examined by dropping a 5 lb weight onto the tank to see if if will cause failure at different heights. In addition the storage crate was also tested for ruggedness by dropping from 2-4 feet to make sure it is able to hold the device safely. All validation resulted in desirable outcomes therefore the team would consider it to be very acceptable. Some things in order to make the validation exam better is to cycle the device many more times in order to see if the device will fail over time or usage. The distance validation could also be better if the team had used actual baits on the surf itself in order to verify the distance will still be achieved within surf fishing conditions.
- Provide 3-4 representative images to illustrate your device and your results. Focus on the “final product,” not the process.
- Below is are figures that demonstrate the final project of the device and the results the team was able to achieve. Figure 1 is the final device along with the provided crate and bait molds. The second figure is the results from the distance validation found by the team. The third picture displays one of the team members using the device and shows how easy it is to use the device.



- 4. Discuss whether you feel your final device succeeded in providing a solution to your proposed problem. Are there issues with the device or the problem statement itself?
- The device has indeed has the functionality and convenience as ones that have already existed in the market, while being cheaper and more portable. Because of so the team would say that the device is providing a solution to the proposed problem. The team did run into some small problems. The team found that the PVC bait mold are not the best method in creating a mold as it becomes difficult to remove it bait and mold. Silicone was a proposed mold material to be used instead. The team has also found that it could have saved more money by using the cheaper schedule 40 PVC instead as it still fits within the working constraints of the device but is more cost effective.
- 5. Discuss 2-3 major lessons/take-aways you have gained from the year-long capstone course. How has the experience helped you to grow as an engineer?
- There were several takeaways the teams had about the capstone project. It helped serve as a reflection which allowed the team to gain a deeper meaning and linking knowledge with experience. Another great takeaway that the team had is the intertwined experience and style of each teammate creating for an interesting team work experience that stressed communication and making sure all teammates are responsible for their part in the project. These things allows the team to grow and gain experience necessary for the work force within the upcoming months.













